Asics Gel-Kayano 31 vs Brooks Glycerin 21
Asics Gel-Kayano 31
Brooks Glycerin 21
Kayano 31 provides the guided stability, Glycerin 21 delivers plush neutral freedom โ your gait decides.
How They Compare
The things that actually matter ๐
Pick Your Side ๐
Which one stole your heart?
Which One Is For You?
Two amazing products, two different vibes โจ
- You overpronate and need a shoe that corrects your gait
- You want stability that does not feel like a medical device
- You appreciate Japanese engineering in your footwear
- You have a neutral gait and want maximum softness
- You run for the joy of it and want every step to feel great
- You need a shoe that pampers your feet on long slow days
The Full Story
LoveBar's deep-dive, written for humans ๐
Asics Gel-Kayano 31 and Brooks Glycerin 21 both promise premium comfort, but they get there through fundamentally different philosophies. The Kayano is a stability shoe โ it guides your foot through each stride with subtle support that overpronators desperately need. Version 31 has gotten so smooth that it barely feels like a stability shoe anymore, which is the highest compliment you can pay the category. The Glycerin 21 is a pure neutral trainer that throws all its budget into cushion. That DNA LOFT foam is like running on a mattress, and Brooks has dialed in the softness to a level that makes easy runs feel like floating. The Kayano is for runners who need their shoe to do more than just cushion โ they need it to correct and protect. The Glycerin is for runners whose feet need no correction, just pure comfort. Know your gait, pick your shoe, and enjoy every mile.